跳到主要內容

Chapter 4, p.7: The Great Divide




The Great Divide
Because no one was filming tango in the barrios of Buenos Aires, it's almost impossible to really understand the way tango developed during the twentieth century—but understanding the evolution of the music is easier. Many early recordings do exist, and the combination of written lyrics and old recordings is enough to provide a basic understanding of the directions the music was taking. So, with the caveat that you should look elsewhere for a more detailed discussion, I'd like to give a few quick examples to illustrate a basic division in the music that occurred 80 years ago. It’s a division that still exists today—both in the play lists of the BsAs DJs, and also in the way people dance.
Pre History
A lot of early music in Argentina was mobile. Payadores with guitars wandered and sang, and their lyrics were often improvised. Two or more musicians would join together and take turns playing, and exchanging made up lyrics—sometimes in the form of questions and answers. The payadores performed outdoors, or in places where people were drinking and dancing, and they often commented on their surroundings—how people looked, or danced, or even the weather. Sometimes the lyrics were crude or obscene, which isn't surprising, since their audiences often consisted of working class men who were hanging out around bars and whorehouses. And there were other groups of musicians playing in the streets as well. They used instruments that were easy to carry around, like guitars, flutes, and violins. And there were also organitos—portable organs that played music on pre-recorded cylinders.
All of these forms of street music must certainly have contributed to tango. Even before radio and phonographs, the sounds of this early tango-like music from the sidewalks must have entered the houses through open windows—just as the sound of the pan flutes of the afiladores echoes through the BsAs neighborhoods and enters houses today. (Afiladores are knife sharpeners who make the rounds of the city, announcing themselves with flutes that can be heard in apartments that are many floors above the street). Here are a couple of examples of the kind of "Old Guard" sound a porteño might think of if you mentioned “tango” prior to 1920:
Eduardo Arolas (left)
Eduardo Arolas, (seated left, 1912)
introduced the bandoneon to tango.


Musica Guardia Vieja

MEDIA LUZ, Carlos Gardel

The Sextet
When tango moved indoors, the piano became part of the orchestra, and the sextet, a basic form of tango orchestra was born. It consisted of two bandoneons, two violins, a piano, and a bass. Here is an example of an early sextet, Roberto Firpo’s orchestra, with Eduardo Arolas. Firpo introduced the piano to tango, and Eduardo Arolas introduced the bandoneon. Here they are in 1928 (The first tango is “Fireworks”, and the second is “Sunrise”): 
Roberto Firpo
Roberto Firpo
FUEGOS ARTICIALES, Roberto Firpo and Eduardo Arolas

EL AMANECER, Roberto Firpo

De Caro’s Revolution
Let’s listen one more time to a typical 1920s tango orchestra. Here is Orquesta Tipica Victor in 1926:
PATO, Orquesta Tipica Victor

Now, here’s the Revolution—this is Flores Negras (“Black Flowers”), recorded two years after Pato.
Julio De Caro
Julio De Caro
FLORES NEGRAS, Julio De Caro


The difference in these two pieces music is striking. A lot has been written about how De Caro changed tango, but the comparison of these two pieces shows it very clearly. The pre-De Caro style has a marching, almost dirge-like cadence. But De Caro’s music replaces the thumping street rhythms with a lighter melodic sound. He created a style of tango that was able to leave the bars and whorehouses of the arrabal and move into the black-tie dinner shows in downtown BsAs… or even in Paris.  The split in styles can be seen in these two tangos that were recorded ten years later. They are different versions of Vieja Amiga, both from 1938:

VIEJA AMIGA, Francisco Canaro

Pedro Laurenz
Pedro Laurenz
VIEJA AMIGA, Pedro Laurenz

The first version of Vieja Amiga by Canaro uses the old marching cadences from the very start, while Laurenz’s Vieja Amiga begins with a piano melody (if the piano sounds nice, it should—the band’s pianist was Osvaldo Pugliese). Laurenz’s version sounds more “modern” (and in fact, the DJs do play Laurenz’s tango almost every day in BsAs), but both tangos were recorded in the same year. The difference is that these two tangos are from different camps. We are hearing the great divide in tango. Ten years after De Caro’s revolution, the traditionalists like D’Arienzo, Canaro, and Biaggi tended to retain more of the jumpy rhythms of the street. But the evolutionists like Laurenz, and Fresedo began to play De Caro’s smoother, more instrumental sound... and they saw D’Arienzo as a sort of embarrassing reactionary who was holding back the progress of tango. This divide between “street” and sophistication continues today—most Buenos Aires DJ’s play a mix of tandas in the milongas, balancing rhythmic tango picado with tandas of more instrumental tangos.
****
So what about D’Arienzo? On the previous page I began with a quote about the genius of creating something new and useful through simplification. Of course genius is an overused word—but by emphasizing the beat and passion of the music, D’Arienzo probably created the tango we know today. In fact without him, it’s likely that no one today would even be dancing tango. And it’s also probable that apart from a few enthusiasts in the suburbs of Buenos Aires, no one today would have even heard of Troilo, or Laurenz, or Piazzolla.
Finally, think about this: Here was a guy who came along and broke all the rules. He played too fast; he pounded out a relentless rhythm; he jumped around and twitched to the music—and sometimes he even shouted out like a madman. And he did it on stage, in front of everyone! Naturally, he was ridiculed and laughed at... but he was also idolized by the people who bought the tickets. Sound familiar? A decade or so after D’Arienzo began to fill up the dance halls in BsAs, a handful of musicians in Memphis and the rest of the South began fooling around with some of the rural folk music of the U.S. They speeded it up, emphasized the beat, and even began to twitch and jump around on stage the same way D’Arienzo was doing ten years earlier. And just like D'Arienzo, they were laughed at.
What irony... because it was D'Arienzo, the reactionary opponent of De Caro, who was actually the revolutionary! He started a revolution that was profound enough to ensure the popularity of tango around the world, and to sustain both the music and dancing into the 21st century. And what's more, his vision foreshadowed the greatest revolution in all of music—because, whether he was a genius, or a visionary (or just lucky), this funny looking man jumping around in front of his orchestra in Buenos Aires 70 years ago, may have been the first to discover the formula that would eventually create the billionaire rock stars of today!

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

Chapter 5, p.3: 有力度落差的身體語言:Blas

Blas 三年前,Blas 和 Graciela 決定在市中心創辦一個新的 milonga。 照布宜諾斯艾利斯的傳統,主辦者會以跳一支 La Cumparsita 開場。 這不算正式表演, 但其他舞者會禮貌地退到場邊, 在最後給新人一點掌聲—— 象徵帶來好運。 看起來這場「開場舞」真的帶來好運, 因為之後這個 milonga 就變得非常受歡迎。 但如果你看到它的第一晚, 可能完全想不到會有今天這樣的盛況。 那天, 我想只有 Alej 和我, 再加上一團剛表演完、正在收拾樂器的樂隊, 差不多就這麼多人。 以下就是當天, Blas 和 Graciela 跳的 D'Arienzo 版本的 La Cumparsita : 比較這支影片與前一頁的那支 把這支影片與上一頁的影片放在一起看,你會立刻發現許多不同。 Blas 的移動比 Ismael 多,也做了更多「步子」(我永遠搞不清楚該怎麼稱呼探戈裡的那些動作——它們是步?套路?還是組合?) 如果硬要說, 你也許會覺得這支影片裡的 Blas 跳得比 Ismael 更「複雜」。 但真的是嗎? 如果是,那為什麼? 因為音樂不同? 場合不同? 還是因為 Blas 本來就喜歡加入更多元素,而 Ismael 選擇極簡? 我認為——三者都有一點。 音樂確實不同 我原本想說《La Cumparsita》比《Extraña》更複雜, 但後來發現事情沒那麼簡單。 《Extraña》屬於 Laurenz 的後期風格, 源自 De Caro 的「新派、精緻、音樂性強」的演進; 而 Blas 跳的是最古老的探戈之一, 由「節奏之王」D'Arienzo 所演奏—— 而 D'Arienzo 反而常被嫌「太簡單」。 所以,你若說 Blas 的音樂比較複雜, 其實會陷入矛盾。 但 D'Arienzo 的《La Cumparsita》 確實比《Extraña》有更多段落、更多轉折。 而且,《Extraña》的旋律線條比較平滑( conjunctive ), 上上下下都像在滑行; 但《Cumparsita》的音階跳動較大( disjunctive ), 高音和低音之間的落差明顯。 這對跳舞有什麼影響? 音樂越有段落、越有力度差、越「跳躍」, ...

Chapter 5, p.18, Ricardo 留給我們的事物 Ricardo Vidort (5)

  Ricardo 留給我們的事物 (What Ricardo Left Us) 我一向對那些只在意華麗舞步與炫技動作的人缺乏耐性。 但或許我也不該那麼嚴厲—— 因為我自己也曾經走過那條路。 我很早就意識到,1990 年代在美國被包裝販售的「舞台探戈」其實毫無意義; 然而,要真正理解 真正的探戈 ,我仍花了很長的時間。 我和 Natu 五年前那場辯論,就是最好的例子。 那時,我雖然常去 milonga、與 milongueros 相處, 卻還沒有培養出一雙真正懂得「看探戈」的眼睛。 在我當時的眼裡, Tete 那種充滿動能、肢體誇張的舞看起來「更厲害」。 如今回頭看,那真是個錯誤的比較。 Tete 當然是個偉大的舞者(我們稍後會談他), 但拿他與 Ricardo 相比, 就像把蘋果和橘子放在一起比。 現在,經過大約 一萬支舞的經驗 之後, 我終於理解了當年 Natu 想告訴我的事: Ricardo Vidort 的確是探戈的「大建築師」(Grand Architect of Tango Dancing)。 我不打算在這裡進行艱深的技術分析, 但如果你想從 Ricardo 身上學些什麼, 我可以給你一些觀察的方向。 首先、也是最明顯的一點—— 他 永遠在節拍(compás)裡。 他曾告訴我, 以前他和其他 milongueros 之間有個遊戲: 誰在一整晚的舞裡 第一個踩出節拍外的步子 , 那個人就得請大家喝香檳。 他笑著說:「我從來沒請過。」 我相信這是真的。 我完全無法想像他會有哪一步走在音樂之外。 Ricardo 有一種極其獨特的方式, 能把節奏感**融入 giro(旋轉)與 corridita(短跑步)**裡。 有時他只踩重拍, 有時又在 giro 裡穿插一連串快速的步伐, 進出之間連綴成節奏的波浪。 他會向前或向後做 corrida,中途加入停頓, 甚至讓步伐畫出弧線。 他還將 sacada(穿插步) 與 vai-ven(搖擺步 / rock step) 靈巧地編入 corrida 中, 這是別人做不到的。 他有一種特別的動作方式—— 一隻腳穩穩踩地, 另一隻腳則像刀尖般快速「刺」出細小的節奏, 同時仍保持著領舞的控制。 探戈通常是以 步與重心轉換 為基礎, 但 Ricardo ...

Chapter 5, p.13: 探戈的樂趣 The Joy of Tango

The Joy of Tango  探戈的樂趣 你可能會注意到,Alej 和 Alito 在裡面犯了好幾個明顯的錯誤。 但我能說什麼呢?探戈的本質就是享受樂趣, 而他們兩個跳得那麼開心,我根本無法捨棄這段。 即使他們彼此絆到、踩錯拍子,看起來都忍不住想笑。 再說,那音樂! 如果聽了不會讓你想立刻站起來跳舞, 那你可能該去找另一個興趣了。 這是 2004 年秋天的一個下午, Alito 和 Alejandra 在 Lo de Celia’s 隨著 Biaggi 的音樂, 輕盈地在舞池中滑動。 作業說明: 請運用你受過訓練的眼光,觀察並指出 Alito 如何以不同的方式「玩音樂」。 你能描述他如何用一種方式表現 節奏(compás) ,又以另一種方式表現 旋律(melody) 嗎? 同時,請討論在探戈中「保持放鬆與身體中心穩定」的重要性。 原文: This always happens. I start out with a great plan, but then I come across a different piece of film and get sidetracked. I was going to use a short clip of  Alito  dancing with another  milonguera  to demonstrate something or other—but then I found this one, and I had to use it instead. I realize it’s too long, it doesn’t show what I wanted… and you’ll probably notice that  Alej  and Alito make several obvious mistakes. But what can I say? Tango's about having fun, and Alej and Alito seem to be enjoying themselves so much that I couldn’t leave it out. Even whe...