跳到主要內容

Chapter 4, p.5: Farol



"Farol"
"Every milonga must have at least two tandas of Di Sarli, and two tandas of Troilo."
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX- Milongueros Ernesto Delgado and Miguel Balbi

Well, this is it. We have arrived at the summit. I may have been a little hard on Troilo and Fiorentino on the last page... after all, who am I to find their version of Encopao lacking? Almost every great milonguero would put Troilo at the top of the list. The maestro of maestros. It took me awhile to figure out why… but the answer is right here! This is the tango they were dreaming about in Emoción:

The Maestro
Anibal Troilo

FAROL, Anibal Troilo orchestra, Francisco Fiorentino singing

Where do we start? The words are almost achingly beautiful. Simple… but also complex. (Yeah, right… but that’s how I feel it.) They paint a picture of the poor neighborhoods that surround the city (in this case, probably Boca or Barracas), and of the souls of the people that live in them. This tango is performed with so much technical skill that it becomes almost the perfect “union of notes and words” that is eulogized in Emoción. I’m no musician (far from it), but my untrained ear hears Troilo and Fiorentino using almost every tool they have. They vary the tempo, the volume, and the tone in a way that creates something so powerful and moving that you can dance to it for years, and still find something new. The best dancers all seek that indescribable thing that tango has. The milongueros call it “entrega”... and if you can’t find it here... you won’t.
What do the lyrics mean in English? The actual words aren’t that difficult to translate, but Homero Expósito’s message takes a little thought. Let’s look at the first couple of verses (Note: a “farol” is an old fashioned type of street lamp that hangs from buildings and is mounted on lampposts in Buenos Aires): 

A neighborhood of poor houses
reflecting the colors of their tin walls…
a human neighborhood,
with its stories sung in tangos.
And in the distance,
a clock strikes two in the morning.
A working neighborhood...
a street corner of memories
...and a farol.
Un arrabal con casas
que reflejan su color de lata...
un arrabal humano,
con leyendas que se cantan como tangos.
Y allá un reloj que lejos da,
las dos de las mañana.
Un arrabal obrero...
una esquina de recuerdos
...y un farol.  

This is poetry. In Farol, Expósito paints a picture of the birth of tango: Of poor immigrants, hard work, beauty... and of things that will never return. There are night shadows under a street lamp, and shadows in the alleys at 2am. A sleeping neighborhood with the “dreams of a million working people” floating up into the night sky. Dreams are “murmuring on the night wind”—while tango lurks in the shadows.
Vengan a ver que triago yo…” says Campos. “Come and see what I bring with this union of notes and words.” Sorry, I have to say it again: This is simple, but it’s also complex. Just as Campos tells us in Emoción, a tango is the sum of several parts. A guy sits in a café at night and dreams some words. Maybe he reworks them and polishes them up a bit. Then someone else reads them, gets inspired, and writes some music—a tune with cadences. Different people play it, rearrange it, sing it, and dance to it—each time in a little different way. And finally, we arrive here.
Let’s listen closely to where Troilo takes us before the singing starts. The opening is a little nervous—a crowded neighborhood going about its business. Then he quiets the orchestra as the sun sets, and the shadows come out (at 00:33). We wander the neighborhood… and then there is a rush of emotion: “La sombra!” (“The shadows!”)—at 00:45. (This is before the words begin, but we know “the shadows” belongs here, because it’s sung to the same music later, at 1:50.) When Fiorentino does begin to sing, Troilo quiets the orchestra again… but it’s still there. CHUNK-chunk-CHUNK-chunk. Piano-bandoneon, piano-bandoneon. Dos por cuatro. Nothing more. Finally, the complex mix of singer, orchestra, and poetry begins in earnest. Let’s look at the second half:

Farol...
the things that can now be seen.
Farol...
not the same as yesterday.
The shadows…
today they escape your gaze,
and leave me more sad,in the middle of my short street.
Y
our light, with the tango in its pocket,
was losing its brilliance… 
and is a cross.
Farol...
las cosas que ahora se ven.
Farol...
ya no es lo mismo que ayer.
La sombra…hoy se escapa a tu mirada
y me deja más tristona la mitad de mi cortada… tu luz, con el tango en el bolsillofue perdiendo luz y brillo…y es una cruz.

[These last two verses of the poem aren’t included in Troilo’s version]

The sky speaks
with the dreams of a million workers…and the wind murmurs
with the poetry of Carriego.
And in the distance,when the clock strikes two in the morning, 
the sleeping arrabal seems to repeat,
“Farol…”

Allí conversa el cielo
con los sueños de un millón de obreros...allí murmura el viento
los poemas populares de Carriego.
Y cuando allá a lo lejos danlas dos de la mañanael arrabal parece que se duerme repitiéndole
al “Farol… “

This tango is heavy on symbolism—beginning with the farol, which is one of the most famous icons of tango. It also has the arrabal, tin houses, poor people, the street, and even a cross. I suppose a work of art can mean different things to different people. For me, “Farol” is like a great painting—you don’t have to look closely at every brush stroke to appreciate it. But I’ve been thinking about the words for awhile, and I’d like to talk about what I think they mean, because Expósito’s poem is addressing the greatest theme in all of tango: nostalgia.
Nostalgia is made up of both wisdom and delusion. Sometimes things in the dim past actually were better… and sometimes they weren’t. Of course, it’s usually difficult to really know either way. Homero Expósito understood this very well, and it seems to me that his subject in “Farol” is the meaning of nostalgia itself. Expósito’s streetlight represents nostalgia—it's the warm light of memory that we use to look into the dark past. It illuminates some things, but it also distorts, and it leaves some things hidden in shadow. It bathes the rough edges of the past in a warm glow that may or may not be “real”. Either way, we certainly have a different perspective than the people who were actually living in this old neighborhood, because not only are we gazing back through the years, but we are also taking our tour through the streets at the tranquil hour of 2am, when everyone is asleep and dreaming.
Expósito is saying that the warmth and tranquility of our viewpoint is, at least in part, an illusion. He knows that life in the old arrabalwas (in the words of Thomas Hobbes) “nasty, brutish, and short”. People were packed together in conventillos, they were working themselves to exhaustion, and for most of them, dreams were the only things that they actually owned. But he also recognizes that through the light of memory, we can now see things that they could not. There actually was humanity and grace... and there was also glory. Because we now know that it was the desperation of the arrabal that made Argentina. Not only did the people of the arraballiterally build Buenos Aires out of bricks and mortar, but through their struggles, they also gave birth to that unique union of music and words that captured the imagination of the rest of the world. Of course, at the time, none of them could know it. 
There are some very nice images here… light reflecting off of the houses, clocks striking in the distance, and dreams and poetry floating on the night wind. But what about the “cross” mentioned at the end of “Farol”? Well, that part drives me crazy. It could have religious implications, and you could even use it to draw some connection between religion and tango… but I don’t think so. Religion has never been part of tango, and I don’t think Argentina is an especially religious country. Argentina is Catholic, but I don’t get the feeling that religion permeates things here in BsAs—at least in the way it does in other parts of Latin America . The Mexicans who live around us in the U.S. seem to live in an almost surrealistic world in which a mixture of the old tribal religions and Catholicism affects almost everything they do—but I think porteños are more interested in psychoanalysis and real estate development than they are in lighting candles to the different saints. (We live in a part of town people call Villa Freud. The name is a tongue in cheek reference to the many Freudian psychoanalysts who live and practice here—but then one of the oldest and most beautiful Catholic churches in the city sits right in the middle of our neighborhood as well.)
Here’s my favorite guess: Maybe the cross in “Farol” represents fate, rather than faith. In Argentina, instead of calling the two sides of a coin “heads” or “tails”, they use “cara” or “cruz” (“face” or “cross”). So maybe the “cruz” in the pocket represents a coin, and the cruzrepresents one side of it. The toss of a coin. Luck. Because people in old-time BsAs were living on the edge. The Yellow Fever in 1870 almost wiped everyone out, and there was certainly no way for the poor people to know what the future held. It’s nice to look back through the warm light of the farol and see something glorious being born, but at that time, survival was far from certain. A few small things happen in a different way, and the coin comes down on the other side…“cara” instead of “cruz”…and they could have all just faded away.
Okay, that’s a stretch. Maybe the most obvious explanation is the best, and Expósito is simply saying that the fading of our memories is a “cross”, a “burden” that we have to live with, as the inspiration for the birth of tango fades into the past. Anyway, I like the coin toss idea.
****
The truth is there was a time when I didn’t like Farol all that much. Here is another version of it by the other great maestro of tango:
Osvaldo Pugliese
Osvaldo Pugliese

FAROL, Osvaldo Pugliese orchestra, Roberto Chanel singing

Draw your own conclusions. Pugliese’s version is probably the better known outside of the milongas, and it’s very nice—but I heard it for years without ever wanting to dance to it. To me it seems more suited for Teatro Colon. I think Troilo’s version has a little harder edge, and Chanel’s voice is no match for Fiorentino’s. It was only after DJs in BsAs like Natu and Dany exposed me to Troilo’s Farolthat the tango really seemed to come alive for dancing. 

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

Chapter 5, p.3: 有力度落差的身體語言:Blas

Blas 三年前,Blas 和 Graciela 決定在市中心創辦一個新的 milonga。 照布宜諾斯艾利斯的傳統,主辦者會以跳一支 La Cumparsita 開場。 這不算正式表演, 但其他舞者會禮貌地退到場邊, 在最後給新人一點掌聲—— 象徵帶來好運。 看起來這場「開場舞」真的帶來好運, 因為之後這個 milonga 就變得非常受歡迎。 但如果你看到它的第一晚, 可能完全想不到會有今天這樣的盛況。 那天, 我想只有 Alej 和我, 再加上一團剛表演完、正在收拾樂器的樂隊, 差不多就這麼多人。 以下就是當天, Blas 和 Graciela 跳的 D'Arienzo 版本的 La Cumparsita : 比較這支影片與前一頁的那支 把這支影片與上一頁的影片放在一起看,你會立刻發現許多不同。 Blas 的移動比 Ismael 多,也做了更多「步子」(我永遠搞不清楚該怎麼稱呼探戈裡的那些動作——它們是步?套路?還是組合?) 如果硬要說, 你也許會覺得這支影片裡的 Blas 跳得比 Ismael 更「複雜」。 但真的是嗎? 如果是,那為什麼? 因為音樂不同? 場合不同? 還是因為 Blas 本來就喜歡加入更多元素,而 Ismael 選擇極簡? 我認為——三者都有一點。 音樂確實不同 我原本想說《La Cumparsita》比《Extraña》更複雜, 但後來發現事情沒那麼簡單。 《Extraña》屬於 Laurenz 的後期風格, 源自 De Caro 的「新派、精緻、音樂性強」的演進; 而 Blas 跳的是最古老的探戈之一, 由「節奏之王」D'Arienzo 所演奏—— 而 D'Arienzo 反而常被嫌「太簡單」。 所以,你若說 Blas 的音樂比較複雜, 其實會陷入矛盾。 但 D'Arienzo 的《La Cumparsita》 確實比《Extraña》有更多段落、更多轉折。 而且,《Extraña》的旋律線條比較平滑( conjunctive ), 上上下下都像在滑行; 但《Cumparsita》的音階跳動較大( disjunctive ), 高音和低音之間的落差明顯。 這對跳舞有什麼影響? 音樂越有段落、越有力度差、越「跳躍」, ...

Chapter 5, p.18, Ricardo 留給我們的事物 Ricardo Vidort (5)

  Ricardo 留給我們的事物 (What Ricardo Left Us) 我一向對那些只在意華麗舞步與炫技動作的人缺乏耐性。 但或許我也不該那麼嚴厲—— 因為我自己也曾經走過那條路。 我很早就意識到,1990 年代在美國被包裝販售的「舞台探戈」其實毫無意義; 然而,要真正理解 真正的探戈 ,我仍花了很長的時間。 我和 Natu 五年前那場辯論,就是最好的例子。 那時,我雖然常去 milonga、與 milongueros 相處, 卻還沒有培養出一雙真正懂得「看探戈」的眼睛。 在我當時的眼裡, Tete 那種充滿動能、肢體誇張的舞看起來「更厲害」。 如今回頭看,那真是個錯誤的比較。 Tete 當然是個偉大的舞者(我們稍後會談他), 但拿他與 Ricardo 相比, 就像把蘋果和橘子放在一起比。 現在,經過大約 一萬支舞的經驗 之後, 我終於理解了當年 Natu 想告訴我的事: Ricardo Vidort 的確是探戈的「大建築師」(Grand Architect of Tango Dancing)。 我不打算在這裡進行艱深的技術分析, 但如果你想從 Ricardo 身上學些什麼, 我可以給你一些觀察的方向。 首先、也是最明顯的一點—— 他 永遠在節拍(compás)裡。 他曾告訴我, 以前他和其他 milongueros 之間有個遊戲: 誰在一整晚的舞裡 第一個踩出節拍外的步子 , 那個人就得請大家喝香檳。 他笑著說:「我從來沒請過。」 我相信這是真的。 我完全無法想像他會有哪一步走在音樂之外。 Ricardo 有一種極其獨特的方式, 能把節奏感**融入 giro(旋轉)與 corridita(短跑步)**裡。 有時他只踩重拍, 有時又在 giro 裡穿插一連串快速的步伐, 進出之間連綴成節奏的波浪。 他會向前或向後做 corrida,中途加入停頓, 甚至讓步伐畫出弧線。 他還將 sacada(穿插步) 與 vai-ven(搖擺步 / rock step) 靈巧地編入 corrida 中, 這是別人做不到的。 他有一種特別的動作方式—— 一隻腳穩穩踩地, 另一隻腳則像刀尖般快速「刺」出細小的節奏, 同時仍保持著領舞的控制。 探戈通常是以 步與重心轉換 為基礎, 但 Ricardo ...

Chapter 5, p.13: 探戈的樂趣 The Joy of Tango

The Joy of Tango  探戈的樂趣 你可能會注意到,Alej 和 Alito 在裡面犯了好幾個明顯的錯誤。 但我能說什麼呢?探戈的本質就是享受樂趣, 而他們兩個跳得那麼開心,我根本無法捨棄這段。 即使他們彼此絆到、踩錯拍子,看起來都忍不住想笑。 再說,那音樂! 如果聽了不會讓你想立刻站起來跳舞, 那你可能該去找另一個興趣了。 這是 2004 年秋天的一個下午, Alito 和 Alejandra 在 Lo de Celia’s 隨著 Biaggi 的音樂, 輕盈地在舞池中滑動。 作業說明: 請運用你受過訓練的眼光,觀察並指出 Alito 如何以不同的方式「玩音樂」。 你能描述他如何用一種方式表現 節奏(compás) ,又以另一種方式表現 旋律(melody) 嗎? 同時,請討論在探戈中「保持放鬆與身體中心穩定」的重要性。 原文: This always happens. I start out with a great plan, but then I come across a different piece of film and get sidetracked. I was going to use a short clip of  Alito  dancing with another  milonguera  to demonstrate something or other—but then I found this one, and I had to use it instead. I realize it’s too long, it doesn’t show what I wanted… and you’ll probably notice that  Alej  and Alito make several obvious mistakes. But what can I say? Tango's about having fun, and Alej and Alito seem to be enjoying themselves so much that I couldn’t leave it out. Even whe...