跳到主要內容

Chapter 4, p.18: Chasing Perfection



Chasing Perfection
The reason Francisco Amor’s singing, or Troilo’s playing, were so good is not because of technical perfection. They were good because both of them understood tango—and knowing tango beats technical perfection every time.
So the obvious question is, how do you get to know tango? What does it even mean to know tango? I’ve talked before about an endless series of doors. Sometimes you open one, but sooner or later, you come up against another. I don’t want to get carried away with analogies, but another way to look at it is that tango is a search for tiny bits of information. The bits are around, but they’re in unexpected places. Not only do you have to be ready to see them, but you have to put them together in the right way. You have to connect the dots. Let me take a minute to talk about a few dots I’ve connected in the last couple of years.
Perfection is our goal in almost everything. Whether it's building a wall, or flying an airplane, or playing sports, the more technical skill you have, the better job you'll do. Perfection may not be attainable, but the closer you get the better. Sure, there are books about how you shouldn't try to be too perfect... about the problems caused by trying to be a perfect mother or husband or human being or something. But the point of those books is simply that trying too hard can cause psychological stress—and that can make you obsessed and weird. Which of course, in the end, really just says that by trying to be too perfect, you become less perfect. But to actually reject perfection? It never even entered my mind.


Perfection: The Blue Angels

Which is why I was a little surprised when my worship at the altar of perfection seemed to lose a little of its fervor about a year ago. I was thinking about making some short videos to demonstrate posture and step. I figured, well, if I’m going to demonstrate these things, they should be just right. But as soon as I began, I realized that making them perfect just didn't seem all that important to me any more. Then, I got in front of a mirror, and I noticed that I wasn’t dancing with the same precision as before. A couple of years earlier, my dancing was technically quite good. I'd spent so much time filming and studying the best dancers that I really began to figure out the biomechanical part. As a result, Alejandra and I developed a relaxed, polished style that people in the milongas found very attractive. But now, my steps didn’t have the crispness or discipline they used to have, and my posture was a little relaxed. The sharp edge wasn’t there. I was forced to face the fact that my dancing was no longer perfect.
At first it bothered me. What was happening? It was strange… I still knew what to do, and I certainly wasn’t tired of tango. In fact I enjoyed it more than ever. But I didn't seem to even have the motivation to investigate where the edge went. It was like losing something that didn't matter that much.
A few months later I was watching the movie Si Sos Brujo (for about the fourth time), and I heard something. The old maestro Balcarce was talking to one of his young musicians about the violin. The young man was one of the best young musicians in BsAs, and he had just asked Balcarce what he thought about the tangos he and his friends were playing. Balcarce said he liked them. He said he thought they were very good... but then he said something very quickly that I had missed earlier. Balcarce turns to his wife and says:
                             "… what was it the Fat Man said? To express tango you need to muddy it up…
                                you need to drag the bow a little. You have to compadrié it."
Maybe I didn’t hear it the other times I watched the movie... but it's also possible that I wasn't ready to hear it. I realize now that he wasn't just saying you have to add a little "street" style to your tango—to put a little bit of an arrabalero accent on it. I think he was trying to tell the young man something more profound. He was saying in a very gentle way that there is more to tango than the innovation and technical precision displayed in his music. And in a way, he may have even been saying that talent and technical precision can somehow hinder the expression of tango. But how can that be? Do you actually need to give up a little talent and hard earned technique to play real tango?
I began to think about it, and then I connected it to something I’d already put in Chapter 6. It's the saying by the old jazz musicians about how you must first learn the music, then you must learn your instrument… and finally, you must throw it all out and learn to play. But the thing is, if you’ve spent years perfecting your technique, then "throwing it out" or "muddying it up" means that you have to reject something. They aren't just saying you have to put a cool neighborhood style on it. They seem to be saying that you actually need to give up some of the proficiency that you worked so hard to attain. And the result is that you'll actually be taking a step back from perfection! If you follow it through, there’s no other way to look at it.
It’s a mysterious thing. Does rejecting perfection somehow make room for something else? If so, what? Or is giving up a bit of skill—in a sense, dying a little—just a part of understanding tango? And is it something intentional... or does it just happen one day? All I know is that something inside of me has thrown a little of it away. I didn't plan it, and I didn’t even know it was happening. But it did.

The Fat Man
Anibal Troilo
Troilo gave everything when he played.
He once reluctantly admitted that he sometimes even cried.

Listen one more time to the ending of Suerte Loca—the part after Fiorentino stops singing, where Troilo comes in. This is a man at the top of his game. He’s at the center… probably the most respected man in tango, in front of his orchestra. They have just played through a performance of one of the greatest tangos ever created, and his friend Fiorentino, the average singer who he stuck by and helped, has somehow managed to rise to the occasion. Troilo has stayed in the background through most of it, and now, it’s his turn to finish with the bandoneon. Here it is—the difficult instrument that defines tango—played by the man who defines tango. At the height of tango's popularity, and the height of his powers:

SUERTE LOCA, Troilo con Fiorentino

Listen closely to the ending. It isn't complex. In fact, it's almost anticlimactic. There’s no striking display of keyboard artistry—I've been told there were bandoneonistas who were actually more technically skilled than Troilo. And it isn't loud, either. It's almost like he’s playing with a blanket draped over the instrument; like a man practicing in a small apartment who doesn’t want to disturb the neighbors. It's as if he's playing casually... but if you listen very, very closely you may notice that he subtly changes the volume level as he plays. It's always changing... slightly up, then slightly down... like a man carefully adjusting the volume knob on a radio. He plays humbly and simply... but Troilo puts more of himself into that last half minute of Suerte Loca than most people put into a lifetime of tango.
Suppose you could buy a ticket and go back in time to some smoky milonga where he was playing. Would you skip it if you found out he was sick, but he was going to gut it out and play anyway? He probably wouldn't be quite as sharp. Or maybe you heard Fiorentino had a sore throat and his voice would be a little off. Would the tango be diminished? Would you sell your ticket?

Tango Waits
                                                               “I realized… like I was shot…
                                                                like I was shot with a diamond bullet.
                                                                A diamond through my forehead...
                                                                and I thought, my God… the genius of that! 
"
-
------------------------------                                                                        --Col. Kurtz (Marlon Brando) in Apocalypse Now

There’s one more thing about Troilo:  He said the smartest thing anyone has ever said about tango. He nailed it in four words. It’s my hobby to analyze and discuss things about tango on this site. I've written tens of thousands of words, but the sum of them doesn't come close to what Troilo said. So I'll try to be a little more like Werner Herzog. I’m just going to put it out there, and let you decide. It may not mean much, or it may mean a lot. Or it may hit you like that “complete, crystalline, pure” bullet that separated Col. Kurtz from his sanity in Apocalypse Now.  Either way, this is all you need to know about tango:

"El tango te espera."

****
That’s it. I read back through this last page, and I realized it's full of questions—and I don't think we answered any of them. But maybe that's okay, because after all, we're talking about tango. People were trying to figure it out long before I came along, and they'll still be at it after I'm gone.

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

Chapter 5, p.3: 有力度落差的身體語言:Blas

Blas 三年前,Blas 和 Graciela 決定在市中心創辦一個新的 milonga。 照布宜諾斯艾利斯的傳統,主辦者會以跳一支 La Cumparsita 開場。 這不算正式表演, 但其他舞者會禮貌地退到場邊, 在最後給新人一點掌聲—— 象徵帶來好運。 看起來這場「開場舞」真的帶來好運, 因為之後這個 milonga 就變得非常受歡迎。 但如果你看到它的第一晚, 可能完全想不到會有今天這樣的盛況。 那天, 我想只有 Alej 和我, 再加上一團剛表演完、正在收拾樂器的樂隊, 差不多就這麼多人。 以下就是當天, Blas 和 Graciela 跳的 D'Arienzo 版本的 La Cumparsita : 比較這支影片與前一頁的那支 把這支影片與上一頁的影片放在一起看,你會立刻發現許多不同。 Blas 的移動比 Ismael 多,也做了更多「步子」(我永遠搞不清楚該怎麼稱呼探戈裡的那些動作——它們是步?套路?還是組合?) 如果硬要說, 你也許會覺得這支影片裡的 Blas 跳得比 Ismael 更「複雜」。 但真的是嗎? 如果是,那為什麼? 因為音樂不同? 場合不同? 還是因為 Blas 本來就喜歡加入更多元素,而 Ismael 選擇極簡? 我認為——三者都有一點。 音樂確實不同 我原本想說《La Cumparsita》比《Extraña》更複雜, 但後來發現事情沒那麼簡單。 《Extraña》屬於 Laurenz 的後期風格, 源自 De Caro 的「新派、精緻、音樂性強」的演進; 而 Blas 跳的是最古老的探戈之一, 由「節奏之王」D'Arienzo 所演奏—— 而 D'Arienzo 反而常被嫌「太簡單」。 所以,你若說 Blas 的音樂比較複雜, 其實會陷入矛盾。 但 D'Arienzo 的《La Cumparsita》 確實比《Extraña》有更多段落、更多轉折。 而且,《Extraña》的旋律線條比較平滑( conjunctive ), 上上下下都像在滑行; 但《Cumparsita》的音階跳動較大( disjunctive ), 高音和低音之間的落差明顯。 這對跳舞有什麼影響? 音樂越有段落、越有力度差、越「跳躍」, ...

Chapter 5, p.18, Ricardo 留給我們的事物 Ricardo Vidort (5)

  Ricardo 留給我們的事物 (What Ricardo Left Us) 我一向對那些只在意華麗舞步與炫技動作的人缺乏耐性。 但或許我也不該那麼嚴厲—— 因為我自己也曾經走過那條路。 我很早就意識到,1990 年代在美國被包裝販售的「舞台探戈」其實毫無意義; 然而,要真正理解 真正的探戈 ,我仍花了很長的時間。 我和 Natu 五年前那場辯論,就是最好的例子。 那時,我雖然常去 milonga、與 milongueros 相處, 卻還沒有培養出一雙真正懂得「看探戈」的眼睛。 在我當時的眼裡, Tete 那種充滿動能、肢體誇張的舞看起來「更厲害」。 如今回頭看,那真是個錯誤的比較。 Tete 當然是個偉大的舞者(我們稍後會談他), 但拿他與 Ricardo 相比, 就像把蘋果和橘子放在一起比。 現在,經過大約 一萬支舞的經驗 之後, 我終於理解了當年 Natu 想告訴我的事: Ricardo Vidort 的確是探戈的「大建築師」(Grand Architect of Tango Dancing)。 我不打算在這裡進行艱深的技術分析, 但如果你想從 Ricardo 身上學些什麼, 我可以給你一些觀察的方向。 首先、也是最明顯的一點—— 他 永遠在節拍(compás)裡。 他曾告訴我, 以前他和其他 milongueros 之間有個遊戲: 誰在一整晚的舞裡 第一個踩出節拍外的步子 , 那個人就得請大家喝香檳。 他笑著說:「我從來沒請過。」 我相信這是真的。 我完全無法想像他會有哪一步走在音樂之外。 Ricardo 有一種極其獨特的方式, 能把節奏感**融入 giro(旋轉)與 corridita(短跑步)**裡。 有時他只踩重拍, 有時又在 giro 裡穿插一連串快速的步伐, 進出之間連綴成節奏的波浪。 他會向前或向後做 corrida,中途加入停頓, 甚至讓步伐畫出弧線。 他還將 sacada(穿插步) 與 vai-ven(搖擺步 / rock step) 靈巧地編入 corrida 中, 這是別人做不到的。 他有一種特別的動作方式—— 一隻腳穩穩踩地, 另一隻腳則像刀尖般快速「刺」出細小的節奏, 同時仍保持著領舞的控制。 探戈通常是以 步與重心轉換 為基礎, 但 Ricardo ...

Chapter 5, p.13: 探戈的樂趣 The Joy of Tango

The Joy of Tango  探戈的樂趣 你可能會注意到,Alej 和 Alito 在裡面犯了好幾個明顯的錯誤。 但我能說什麼呢?探戈的本質就是享受樂趣, 而他們兩個跳得那麼開心,我根本無法捨棄這段。 即使他們彼此絆到、踩錯拍子,看起來都忍不住想笑。 再說,那音樂! 如果聽了不會讓你想立刻站起來跳舞, 那你可能該去找另一個興趣了。 這是 2004 年秋天的一個下午, Alito 和 Alejandra 在 Lo de Celia’s 隨著 Biaggi 的音樂, 輕盈地在舞池中滑動。 作業說明: 請運用你受過訓練的眼光,觀察並指出 Alito 如何以不同的方式「玩音樂」。 你能描述他如何用一種方式表現 節奏(compás) ,又以另一種方式表現 旋律(melody) 嗎? 同時,請討論在探戈中「保持放鬆與身體中心穩定」的重要性。 原文: This always happens. I start out with a great plan, but then I come across a different piece of film and get sidetracked. I was going to use a short clip of  Alito  dancing with another  milonguera  to demonstrate something or other—but then I found this one, and I had to use it instead. I realize it’s too long, it doesn’t show what I wanted… and you’ll probably notice that  Alej  and Alito make several obvious mistakes. But what can I say? Tango's about having fun, and Alej and Alito seem to be enjoying themselves so much that I couldn’t leave it out. Even whe...