跳到主要內容

Chapter 4, p.15: Tango for Adults



Tango for Adults
"To feel that life is only a breath of wind...
that twenty years is nothing."
  

A few weeks ago, I happened to rent a couple of movies with tango music in them. It was just a coincidence, and it wasn't until I thought about it later that I realized tango was a key part of both movies. The first one was Volver, and the second was Little Dieter Needs to Fly. The two movies are as different as two movies can be... and so are their directors. Volver is from the Spanish director Pedro Almodovar, who specializes in, I guess you could say, the psychodrama of sex, women and families. Little Dieter is a documentary by Werner Herzog, the almost insane German director whose movies are often about men trying to survive in brutal environments. Both of them are "New Wave" directors who are on the cutting edge of modern filmmaking, yet they used 75-year-old tango music as an integral part of both of these movies. And not only that... they both used the same tango!
The tango is Volver ("To Return"). It's not a dance tango, but I'd like to talk about it anyway, because it's an example of the lasting power and durability of the music from tango's Golden Age. In the movie Volver, the heroine sings a flamenco version of the tango, which she learned from her mother. She believes her mother has died—but she is actually still alive, and listening to her sing from a hiding place. When her mother hears her daughter singing, she feels the full impact of the music's message, and begins to cry. Almodovar uses it as the emotional high point of the movie.
Werner Herzog also uses Volver, but he puts it in a very different movie. Little Dieter is a documentary about a man who survived the allied bombing of Germany as a child in World War II, and then immigrated to the U.S. Eventually, he became a pilot in the U.S. Navy, and ended up being shot down over the jungle in Laos during the Viet Nam war. He was captured, and he endured almost unbelievable hardship and torture. Again, tango is an integral part of the film—but I have to admit, at first I didn't get it. Herzog shows archival footage of starving German children during WWII, and then the scene jumps to Viet Nam. As the grainy black and white film rolls, first of starving children amid the ruins of WWII, and then of carrier operations in the Tonkin Gulf during the 1960s, Gardel begins to sing. It's a very strange mix—grainy footage of Spads and A-4s being launched from the deck of the USS Ranger... and then, turn of the century music from the arrabal of Buenos Aires:

VOLVER, Carlos Gardel 

The music must be important, because Herzog plays the full version during these crucial scenes, and then he uses it again later in the movie, as Dieter Dingler sits on a bridge over the Mekong River discussing his life. But what does it mean? Well, Herzog is a very sharp and interesting guy. One of the problems I have with today's movies is that they insult your intelligence. But that doesn't happen with him. In fact, sometimes, he almost doesn't seem to care if you get it or not. (Another of his recent films is a documentary called Grizzly Man. It's about a man and his girlfriend who are killed and eaten by a bear. Herzog has an actual audio recording of the attack... but he doesn't use it. We see him listen to it for a moment with earphones, but then he simply says it's too horrible. So he continues the story without it.)
It turns out that some of the keys to Little Dieter are hidden in the lyrics of Volver—which is really fascinating when you think about it. Herzog is a German director, making a documentary in English—but to get it, you have to understand an old Argentine tango with castellano lyrics! And what if you don't? Too bad. Herzog isn't going to hold your hand.
Here's the translation:

I imagine the flickering
of the distant lights
that will signal my return.

They are the same that lit
my deep hours of suffering
with their pale reflection.
And although I didn't want to return,
we always return to our first love.

The old street where the words echo:
"Her life is yours, her love is yours"...
beneath the gaze of indifferent stars
that mock my return.

To return...
with wrinkles on my forehead,
and the snows of time
silvering my temples.

To feel that life is just a breath...
that twenty years is nothing...
how fevered the gaze,
searching the shadows,
looking for you... naming you.

To live...
with the soul grasping
to a sweet memory,
that cries once again.

I fear meeting
with the past that returns
to confront my life.

I fear the nights,
filled with memories,
that imprison my dreams.
But sooner or later, the traveler
must stop running away.

While the passing of time
is destroying my old memories,
the simple treasure of hope
still hides in my heart.
Yo adivino el parpadeo
de las luces que a lo lejos,
van marcando mi retorno.


Son las mismas que alumbraron,
con sus pálidos reflejos,
hondas horas de dolor.

Y aunque no quise el regreso,
siempre se vuelve al primer amor.

La vieja calle donde el eco dijo:
"Tuya es su vida, tuyo es su querer"...
bajo el burlón mirar de las estrellas
que con indiferencia hoy me ven volver.

Volver...
con la frente marchita,
las nieves del tiempo
platearon mi sien.


Sentir... que es un soplo la vida,
que veinte años no es nada...
que febril la mirada
errante en las sombras
te busca y te nombra.

Vivir...
con el alma aferrada
a un dulce recuerdo,
que lloro otra vez.

Tengo miedo del encuentro
con el pasado que vuelve
a enfrentarse con mi vida.

Tengo miedo de las noches
que pobladas de recuerdos,
encadenen mi soñar.
Pero el viajero que huye,
tarde o temprano detiene su andar.

Y aunque el olvido que todo destruye,
haya matado mi vieja ilusión,
guarda escondida una esperanza humilde,
que es toda la fortuna de mi corazón.

Herzog's movie begins with Dieter Dingler walking quietly around San Francisco, and then driving to his nice home in Marin County. He looks like any other guy, but Herzog’s voice in the background tells a different story. He says something like, “You see a man on the street… he may look normal… but you can’t see inside. You can’t know where he has been, or what may haunt him.” It turns out that this normal looking man, with “the snows of time” in his hair, has spent time in hell. For several years after his ordeal in the jungle, he couldn’t sleep. When he eventually returned to his ship, the captain actually gave his comfortable quarters to Dieter to try to help him. Finally, they found the only place he could sleep was in the cockpit of an airplane, so they reserved a plane on the hangar deck for him to sit in and sleep.
In his home, Dieter somewhat sheepishly raises the floorboards to reveal a cache of food. There are large barrels of wheat and honey, and he can’t live unless he knows they are in the house. Dieter appears normal, but he isn't. For him, his “deep hours of suffering” from thirty years earlier seem like yesterday, and he fears the night, and the memories that return to confront him. Then, almost cruelly, Herzog takes Dingler back to the Jungles of Southeast Asia to film the rest of the documentary. So, like our narrator in Volver, Dingler returns to confront his demons. Suddenly, the use of this tango makes sense. Listen to the words again, and if you can, try to get beyond the English. I never really understood poetry until I started listening to tangos, so see if you can feel the power of the words directly from the castellano:
"Volver... con la frente marchita, las nieves del tiempo platearon mi sien.
  (To return... with wrinkles on my forehead, and the snows of time silvering my temples.)

"Sentir... que es un soplo la vida, que veinte años no es nada..."   (To feel that life is only a breath... that twenty years is nothing....)
And finally this:

" I fear the night, filled with the memories that imprison my dreams...
  but sooner or later, you must to stop running."
Pretty serious stuff. But to me, both the music, and the story it tells, seem a little old fashioned for modern ears. I began to wonder if maybe the success of Volver was because people back in the '30s were more serious. Maybe it was a different time, and people were more open to a “heavy” message like this one. So just for fun, I decided to check the most popular songs in the year Volver was released. Number one on the hit parade for 1935 was Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers singing Dancing Cheek to Cheek. And the second most popular song in the world was… get ready… Shirley Temple singing On the Good Ship Lollipop!  Yikes. So much for that theory.
Anyway, in the seventy years since this music was released, the popularity of Argentine tango has spread all over the world. (I even get emails from a group of people in Hanoi, Viet Nam, who want to build a tango community.) But that doesn’t necessarily mean tango is for everybody. I think you need to have been around the block a few times for the message in a tango like Volver to really hit home. Which raises a question: Is tango only for grown-ups? Let's talk about that on the next page.

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

Chapter 5, p.3: 有力度落差的身體語言:Blas

Blas 三年前,Blas 和 Graciela 決定在市中心創辦一個新的 milonga。 照布宜諾斯艾利斯的傳統,主辦者會以跳一支 La Cumparsita 開場。 這不算正式表演, 但其他舞者會禮貌地退到場邊, 在最後給新人一點掌聲—— 象徵帶來好運。 看起來這場「開場舞」真的帶來好運, 因為之後這個 milonga 就變得非常受歡迎。 但如果你看到它的第一晚, 可能完全想不到會有今天這樣的盛況。 那天, 我想只有 Alej 和我, 再加上一團剛表演完、正在收拾樂器的樂隊, 差不多就這麼多人。 以下就是當天, Blas 和 Graciela 跳的 D'Arienzo 版本的 La Cumparsita : 比較這支影片與前一頁的那支 把這支影片與上一頁的影片放在一起看,你會立刻發現許多不同。 Blas 的移動比 Ismael 多,也做了更多「步子」(我永遠搞不清楚該怎麼稱呼探戈裡的那些動作——它們是步?套路?還是組合?) 如果硬要說, 你也許會覺得這支影片裡的 Blas 跳得比 Ismael 更「複雜」。 但真的是嗎? 如果是,那為什麼? 因為音樂不同? 場合不同? 還是因為 Blas 本來就喜歡加入更多元素,而 Ismael 選擇極簡? 我認為——三者都有一點。 音樂確實不同 我原本想說《La Cumparsita》比《Extraña》更複雜, 但後來發現事情沒那麼簡單。 《Extraña》屬於 Laurenz 的後期風格, 源自 De Caro 的「新派、精緻、音樂性強」的演進; 而 Blas 跳的是最古老的探戈之一, 由「節奏之王」D'Arienzo 所演奏—— 而 D'Arienzo 反而常被嫌「太簡單」。 所以,你若說 Blas 的音樂比較複雜, 其實會陷入矛盾。 但 D'Arienzo 的《La Cumparsita》 確實比《Extraña》有更多段落、更多轉折。 而且,《Extraña》的旋律線條比較平滑( conjunctive ), 上上下下都像在滑行; 但《Cumparsita》的音階跳動較大( disjunctive ), 高音和低音之間的落差明顯。 這對跳舞有什麼影響? 音樂越有段落、越有力度差、越「跳躍」, ...

Chapter 5, p.18, Ricardo 留給我們的事物 Ricardo Vidort (5)

  Ricardo 留給我們的事物 (What Ricardo Left Us) 我一向對那些只在意華麗舞步與炫技動作的人缺乏耐性。 但或許我也不該那麼嚴厲—— 因為我自己也曾經走過那條路。 我很早就意識到,1990 年代在美國被包裝販售的「舞台探戈」其實毫無意義; 然而,要真正理解 真正的探戈 ,我仍花了很長的時間。 我和 Natu 五年前那場辯論,就是最好的例子。 那時,我雖然常去 milonga、與 milongueros 相處, 卻還沒有培養出一雙真正懂得「看探戈」的眼睛。 在我當時的眼裡, Tete 那種充滿動能、肢體誇張的舞看起來「更厲害」。 如今回頭看,那真是個錯誤的比較。 Tete 當然是個偉大的舞者(我們稍後會談他), 但拿他與 Ricardo 相比, 就像把蘋果和橘子放在一起比。 現在,經過大約 一萬支舞的經驗 之後, 我終於理解了當年 Natu 想告訴我的事: Ricardo Vidort 的確是探戈的「大建築師」(Grand Architect of Tango Dancing)。 我不打算在這裡進行艱深的技術分析, 但如果你想從 Ricardo 身上學些什麼, 我可以給你一些觀察的方向。 首先、也是最明顯的一點—— 他 永遠在節拍(compás)裡。 他曾告訴我, 以前他和其他 milongueros 之間有個遊戲: 誰在一整晚的舞裡 第一個踩出節拍外的步子 , 那個人就得請大家喝香檳。 他笑著說:「我從來沒請過。」 我相信這是真的。 我完全無法想像他會有哪一步走在音樂之外。 Ricardo 有一種極其獨特的方式, 能把節奏感**融入 giro(旋轉)與 corridita(短跑步)**裡。 有時他只踩重拍, 有時又在 giro 裡穿插一連串快速的步伐, 進出之間連綴成節奏的波浪。 他會向前或向後做 corrida,中途加入停頓, 甚至讓步伐畫出弧線。 他還將 sacada(穿插步) 與 vai-ven(搖擺步 / rock step) 靈巧地編入 corrida 中, 這是別人做不到的。 他有一種特別的動作方式—— 一隻腳穩穩踩地, 另一隻腳則像刀尖般快速「刺」出細小的節奏, 同時仍保持著領舞的控制。 探戈通常是以 步與重心轉換 為基礎, 但 Ricardo ...

Chapter 5, p.13: 探戈的樂趣 The Joy of Tango

The Joy of Tango  探戈的樂趣 你可能會注意到,Alej 和 Alito 在裡面犯了好幾個明顯的錯誤。 但我能說什麼呢?探戈的本質就是享受樂趣, 而他們兩個跳得那麼開心,我根本無法捨棄這段。 即使他們彼此絆到、踩錯拍子,看起來都忍不住想笑。 再說,那音樂! 如果聽了不會讓你想立刻站起來跳舞, 那你可能該去找另一個興趣了。 這是 2004 年秋天的一個下午, Alito 和 Alejandra 在 Lo de Celia’s 隨著 Biaggi 的音樂, 輕盈地在舞池中滑動。 作業說明: 請運用你受過訓練的眼光,觀察並指出 Alito 如何以不同的方式「玩音樂」。 你能描述他如何用一種方式表現 節奏(compás) ,又以另一種方式表現 旋律(melody) 嗎? 同時,請討論在探戈中「保持放鬆與身體中心穩定」的重要性。 原文: This always happens. I start out with a great plan, but then I come across a different piece of film and get sidetracked. I was going to use a short clip of  Alito  dancing with another  milonguera  to demonstrate something or other—but then I found this one, and I had to use it instead. I realize it’s too long, it doesn’t show what I wanted… and you’ll probably notice that  Alej  and Alito make several obvious mistakes. But what can I say? Tango's about having fun, and Alej and Alito seem to be enjoying themselves so much that I couldn’t leave it out. Even whe...